Munoz

Munoz v. PHH Mortgage Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20211:08-cv-00759California5,723 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EFRAIN MUNOZ, individually and on No. 1:08-cv-00759-DAD-BAM behalf of all others similarly situated, et al., 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ v. MOTION TO REOPEN LAW AND MOTION 14 PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, et (Doc. No. 437) al., Defendants. 17 18 This matter is before the court on the motion to reopen law and motion filed on behalf of defendants PHH Corporation, PHH Mortgage Corporation, and PHH Home Loans, LLC (collectively, “PHH”), and defendant Atrium Insurance Corporation (“Atrium”) (collectively, “defendants”) on February 6, 2021. (Doc. No. 437.) Specifically, defendants seek to reopen law and motion for the purpose of filing a renewed motion for summary judgment on the issue of Article III standing. (Id.) Pursuant to General Order No. 617 addressing the public health emergency posed by the coronavirus pandemic, the court took this matter under submission to be decided on the papers. (Doc. No. 438.) For the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.