Munoz
Munoz v. PHH Mortgage Corp.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EFRAIN MUNOZ, individually and on No. 1:08-cv-00759-DAD-BAM behalf of all others similarly situated, et al., 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ v. MOTION TO REOPEN LAW AND MOTION 14 PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, et (Doc. No. 437) al., Defendants. 17 18 This matter is before the court on the motion to reopen law and motion filed on behalf of defendants PHH Corporation, PHH Mortgage Corporation, and PHH Home Loans, LLC (collectively, “PHH”), and defendant Atrium Insurance Corporation (“Atrium”) (collectively, “defendants”) on February 6, 2021. (Doc. No. 437.) Specifically, defendants seek to reopen law and motion for the purpose of filing a renewed motion for summary judgment on the issue of Article III standing. (Id.) Pursuant to General Order No. 617 addressing the public health emergency posed by the coronavirus pandemic, the court took this matter under submission to be decided on the papers. (Doc. No. 438.) For the…