Guibord

(PC) Turner v. Guibord

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 23, 20212:19-cv-00416California533 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ANTHONY DEWAYNE LEE TURNER, No. 2:19-cv-0416 TLN DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO CITY FIRE DEPT., et al., 14 Defendants. 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds pro se with a civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In an order filed on May 3, 2021, plaintiff was ordered to complete and return to the court, within thirty days and at the same time, the properly completed USM-285 form, summons, and two copies of the operative complaint so that defendant Guibord could be served. On June 16, 2021, the court received plaintiff’s returned documents. The documents are not properly completed. Plaintiff did not submit two copies of the operative complaint as directed. Plaintiff also failed to properly fill out the USM-285 form and summons as directed in that there is no clear address information for service of defendant Guibord, who is the only defendant to be served in this case. Instead of including the information for defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.