(HC) Battle v. David Holbrook

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AUTHUR J.M. BATTLE, III, Case No. 2:20-cv-01851-JAM-JDP (HC) Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL RULES

DAVID HOLBROOK,1 ECF No. 17 Respondent.

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

DAYS 17 On May 7, 2021, respondent filed a motion to dismiss this case. ECF No. 17. To date, 18 petitioner has not filed a response. 19 In cases where a party is incarcerated and proceeding without counsel, a responding party 20 is required to file either an opposition or a statement of non-opposition not more than twenty-one 21 days after the motion is served. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(l). Failure “to file an opposition or to file a 22 statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the 23 motion and may result in the imposition of sanctions.” Id. 24 25 26 1 David Holbrook is the Warden of Chuckawalla Valley State Prison,…