Unknown

(HC) Ayala v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 24, 20212:21-cv-00601California411 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FELIX R. AYALA, No. 2:21-cv-00601 GGH P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

UNKNOWN, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, commenced this action by filing a motion for extension of time to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus. ECF No. 1. The matter was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302(c). On April 9, 2021, the undersigned issued an order denying petitioner’s motion for extension of time to file a habeas petition. ECF No. 3. In addition, the undersigned granted petitioner sixty days from the date of the order to file a habeas petition in order to properly commence this action as required by Rule 3 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases. Id. at 1. Petitioner was further informed he must either pay the required filing fee or file an application requesting leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Id.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.