Connelly

Connelly v. Starbucks Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 24, 20211:21-cv-00746California1,912 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 Case No. 1: 21-cv-00746-DAD-SAB

KERRY CONNELLY,

SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P 16) Plaintiff,

Amendment and Discovery Deadlines:

Amendment of Pleadings: September 17, 2021 Pre-Certification Discovery: December 17, 2021 v.

Class Certification Deadlines:

Motion Filing: January 18, 2022 STARBUCKS CORPORATION, Opposition: March 1, 2022 Reply: March 22, 2022 Defendant. No Hearing Shall Be Set

16 I. Date of Scheduling Conference The Scheduling Conference was held on June 24, 2021. II. Appearances of Counsel Simon Yang appeared via video on behalf of Plaintiff. Gregory Knopp appeared via video on behalf of Defendant. III. Consent to Magistrate Judge The parties have not consented to magistrate jurisdiction. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), to the parties who have not consented to conduct all further…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.