Baccera
(PC) Pradia, Jr. v. Baccera
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARL LAPRA PRADIA, JR., Case No. 1:20-cv-01348-JLT (PC)
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
TO DISMISS CLAIMS AND
v. DEFENDANTS
A. BECERRA, et al., 14-DAY DEADLINE Defendants. Clerk of the Court to Assign a District Judge 16 On May 6, 2021, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that it states cognizable claims of deliberate indifference to serious medical needs against Defendants Becerra and Davis, but that its remaining claims were not cognizable. (Doc. 8.) The Court therefore directed Plaintiff to file a first amended complaint within 21 days to cure the deficiencies in his pleading or to notify the Court that he wishes to proceed only on the claims found cognizable. (Id. at 7-8.) The Court cautioned Plaintiff that failure to comply with the order would result in a “recommend[ation] that this action proceed only on the claims found cognizable . . . and that all other claims and defendants be…