Depovic

(PC) Lipsey, Jr. v. Depovic

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 25, 20211:18-cv-00767California773 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER LIPSEY, JR., Case No. 1:18-cv-00767-NONE-HBK

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR DISCOVERY ORDER WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE

DR. DEPOVIC, et al., (Doc. No. 39)

Defendants. O POR SD TE SR C R RE EF EE NR INR GIN AG D C RA ASE N DT O S TAY OF CASE FOR 90 DAYS

18 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion requesting the Court to set a discovery and scheduling order in this case. (Doc. No. 39). Plaintiff Christopher Lipsey, Jr. is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this action. As set forth in the screening order, the Court has found the first amended complaint stated a medical deliberate indifference claims against Defendants Depovic and Grewall. (Doc. Nos. 12, 18). Defendants filed an answer to the first amended complaint on April 13, 2020. (Doc. No. 28).2 25 1 However, stating a cognizable claim “in no way suggests” that Plaintiff “is likely or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.