Martinez

(PC) L.C. Cunningham v. Martinez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 22, 20211:19-cv-01508California1,128 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 L.C. CUNNINGHAM, Case No. 1:19-cv-01508-AWI-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR AN ORDER UNDER THE

ALL WRITS ACT BE DENIED

M. MARTINEZ, et al., (ECF No. 72) Defendants.

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS

L.C. Cunningham (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 26, 2021, Plaintiff filed what the Court construes as a motion for an order under the All Writs Act. (ECF No. 72). On May 19, 2021, the Warden filed a response. (ECF No. 76). On June 17, 2021, Plaintiff filed a reply. (ECF No. 81). For the reasons described below, the Court will recommend that Plaintiff’s motion for an order under the All Writs Act be denied. I. LEGAL STANDARDS Under the All Writs Act, federal courts “may issue all writs necessary or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.