Lupercio
Lupercio v. Mendoza
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAMON NAVARRO LUPERCIO, Case No. 1:21-cv-580-DAD-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY THE ACTION SHOULD NOT
v. BE DISMISSED MACARIO MENDOZA, FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE Defendant. 16 17 On April 7, 2021, Plaintiff Ramon Navarro Lupercio initiated this action by filing a pro se Complaint under the Civil Rights Act 42 U.S.C. § 1983 while incarcerated at San Quentin Prison. (Doc. No. 1). It appears Plaintiff no longer is incarcerated based on his address of record. (See docket). Upon review of the Complaint, Plaintiff alleges a § 1983 action against a sole defendant: Macario Mendoza. (Doc. No. 1 at 1). The gravamen of the Complaint is Plaintiff claims the victim of his underlying state court conviction, Mr. Mendoza, provided false testimony. (See generally Id.). As relief, Plaintiff seeks both “a new jury trial” and $25 million in damages. (Id. at 3). Because Plaintiff initiated this…