CDCR
(PC) Dunigan v. CDCR
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEVIN DUNIGAN, No. 2:19-cv-2501 WBS AC P Plaintiff, V. ORDER CDCR, et al., Defendants. 16 By order filed March 26, 2020, this action was dismissed, ECF No. 22, and judgment was 18 entered the same day, ECF No. 23. On June 3, 2021,! plaintiff filed an amended petition for writ 19 of error coram nobis. The motion is incomprehensible and fails to identify any grounds for relief. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s amended motion for writ of error coram nobis, ECF No. 37, is denied. Any further such motions shall be disregarded. Dated: June 22, 2021 / ‘ZL, . a / th tenn Von Loh
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Duni2501.850 26 ——— ' Since plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se, he is afforded the benefit of the prison mailbox 28 rule. Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276…