Mancusi

(PC) Uhuru v. Mancusi

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 25, 20212:20-cv-02088California2,051 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KOHEN DIALLO UHURU, No. 2: 20-cv-2088 KJM KJN P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS MANCUSI, et al., Defendants. 16 Introduction Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On November 17, 2020, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. The court deferred consideration of plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis, and cautioned plaintiff that he would be precluded from proceeding in forma pauperis unless he alleged facts demonstrating that at the time he filed this action he was under imminent danger of serious physical injury. (ECF No. 7 at 9.) Following an extension of time, plaintiff filed an amended complaint. As set forth below, the undersigned…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.