Casilla

(PC) Muhammad v. Casilla

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 25, 20212:21-cv-00411California3,188 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KIFA MUHAMMAD, aka MARCUS No. 2:21-cv-0411 KJN P

JOHNSON,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 14 CASILLA, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, currently housed in a county jail, proceeding without counsel. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This proceeding was referred to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(b)(1). By this order, plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). By separate order, the court will direct the appropriate agency to collect the initial partial filing fee from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.