(SS) Lora v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 21, 20211:21-cv-00640California862 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

C.C.R, No. 1:21-cv-0640-NONE-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

v. LUZ LORA’S APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, (Doc. Nos. 5, 7, 9) Defendant.

THIRTY DAY DEADLINE

17 Minor plaintiff C.C.R., by his guardian ad litem, Luz Lora, filed a complaint in this action seeking review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying disability benefits. (Doc. No. 1.) Along with the complaint, Ms. Lora filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. Nos. 5, 7.) The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 11, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations recommending that Ms. Lora’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied. (Doc. No. 9.) The findings and recommendations were served on Ms. Lora and contained notice that any objections…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.