(HC) Trotter v. Superior Court of California, Calaveras County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 22, 20211:21-cv-00570California1,460 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER JOHN TROTTER, Case No. 1:21-cv-00570-DAD-HBK Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS PETITION FOR FAILURE TO

v. EXHAUST CLAIM AND TO DISMISS

CLAIM AS PROCEDURALLY BARRED1

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,

CALAVERAS COUNTY, OBJECTIONS DUE IN TWENTY-ONE

DAYS Respondent. (Doc. No. 1)

17 18 19 Petitioner Christopher John Trotter, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has pending a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. No. 1). This matter is before the Court for preliminary review. See Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, Rule 4; 28 U.S.C. § 2243. Under Rule 4, a district court must dismiss a habeas petition if it “plainly appears” that the petitioner is not entitled to relief. See Valdez v. Montgomery, 918 F.3d 687, 693 (9th Cir. 2019); Boyd v. Thompson, 147 F.3d 1124, 1127 (9th Cir. 1998). Courts have “an active role in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.