Satterfield

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JORGE FERNANDEZ, Case No. 1:19-cv-01220-DAD-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS CLAIMS AND

v. DEFENDANTS

SATTERFIELD, et al., 14-DAY DEADLINE Defendants. 16 On June 6, 2021, the Court screened Plaintiff’s second amended complaint and found that it states cognizable claims of retaliation against Defendants Satterfield, Eslick, Salzer, Bick, Boyette, Darby, and Flores-Hernandez. (Doc. 43.) The remaining claims were not cognizable. (Id.) The Court therefore directed Plaintiff to file a third amended complaint curing the deficiencies in his pleading or to notify the Court that he wishes to proceed only on the claims found cognizable. (Id. at 13.) On June 21, 2021, Plaintiff filed a notice that he “wishes to only proceed on claims found cognizable.” (Doc. 44.) Accordingly, and for the reasons set forth in the Court’s screening order (Doc. 43), the Court RECOMMENDS that: 1. …