Griesbach

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES LUEDTKE, Case No. 1:21-cv-00718-TLN-HBK Plaintiff, Order Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Judge Substitution and Recommending that District v. Court Consider the Motion in Determining Whether a Show Cause Order Shall Issue as to WILLIAM GREISBACH, KIRK OBEAR, Why Plaintiff Should Not Be Deemed a KARINE MORENO-TAXMAN, GINA Vexatious Litigant Under the All Writs Act COLLETTI, RUDOLPH RANDA, ANTHONY ISHII, STANLEY BOOONE, (Doc. No. 8) BARBARA MCAULIFFE, DALE

DROZD, SHEILA OBERTO,

17 Defendants.

19 Pending before the Court is pro se Plaintiff’s “motion for judge substitution” filed June 1, 2021. (Doc. No. 8). Because the motion requests the undersigned to “recuse herself from this case immediately,” the court construes the motion as a motion for recusal. (See Doc. No. 8 at 7). Like the allegations in Plaintiff’s Complaint, Plaintiff refers to the court as a “kangaroo court.” (Id. at 1); (see also Doc. No. 7 at 1-3)…