Corrigan

Corrigan v. County of Calaveras

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 22, 20211:20-cv-00931California7,546 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS JAMES CORRIGAN, et al., No. 1:20-cv-00931-DAD-SKO Plaintiffs, v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

COUNTY OF CALAVERAS, et al., MOTIONS TO DISMISS Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 17, 24)

17 This matter is before the court on two separate motions to dismiss. First, defendant Joseph Boberg has moved to dismiss plaintiffs’ original complaint pursuant to Rule 4(m) and Rule 12(b)(5) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure due to insufficient service of process. (Doc. No. 17.) Second, defendants County of Calaveras, Sheriff DiBasilio, Kevin Stevens, Jim Moser, and Brian Terry have moved to dismiss the first and third causes of action of plaintiffs’ first amended complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) due to plaintiffs’ failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. (Doc. No. 24.) Pursuant to General Order No. 617 addressing the public health emergency posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, both motions…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.