(SS) Tyson v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 29, 20211:21-cv-00688California471 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GLORIA D. TYSON, No. 1:21-cv-00688-BAM

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DAVID F.

CHERMOL’S PRO HAC VICE STATUS

v. SHOULD NOT BE DENIED COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 16

Plaintiff Gloria D. Tyson initiated this action seeking review of a final decision of the Social Security Administration on April 26, 2021. (Doc. 1.) On April 26, 2021, David F. Chermol filed an application to appear and participate pro hac vice in this action on behalf of Plaintiff. (Doc. 4.) Local Rule 180 governs the admission of attorneys to practice pro hac vice in this Court. Pursuant to Local Rule 180(b)(2),

Unless authorized by the Constitution of the United States or an Act of Congress, an attorney is not eligible to practice [pro hac vice] if any one or more of the following apply: (i) the attorney resides in California, (ii) the attorney is regularly employed in California, or (iii)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.