Garcia
(PC) Langley v. Garcia
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RANDY LANGLEY, Case No. 1:16-cv-01299-JLT (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
v. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE
COURT’S ORDER
E. GARCIA, G. COOK, Defendants.
16 On October 13, 2020, the Court issued a Second Scheduling Order, which directed Plaintiff and Defendants to file pretrial statements by April 26 and May 17, 2021, respectively, pursuant to Local Rule 281. (Doc. 67.) The order also directed Plaintiff to file a motion for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses, and to notify the Court of the attendance of unincarcerated witnesses whom he intends to subpoena, by April 26, 2021. (Id. at 5.) The Court warned that “[f]ailure to comply with the . . . order or the Local Rules may result in the imposition of sanctions up to and including dismissal of this action.” (Id. at 1.) Although the April 26 deadline has passed, Plaintiff has failed to file a pretrial statement, to request…