Garcia

(PC) Langley v. Garcia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 18, 20211:16-cv-01299California508 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RANDY LANGLEY, Case No. 1:16-cv-01299-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE

COURT’S ORDER

E. GARCIA, G. COOK, Defendants.

16 On October 13, 2020, the Court issued a Second Scheduling Order, which directed Plaintiff and Defendants to file pretrial statements by April 26 and May 17, 2021, respectively, pursuant to Local Rule 281. (Doc. 67.) The order also directed Plaintiff to file a motion for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses, and to notify the Court of the attendance of unincarcerated witnesses whom he intends to subpoena, by April 26, 2021. (Id. at 5.) The Court warned that “[f]ailure to comply with the . . . order or the Local Rules may result in the imposition of sanctions up to and including dismissal of this action.” (Id. at 1.) Although the April 26 deadline has passed, Plaintiff has failed to file a pretrial statement, to request…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.