Rocha

(PC) Ramos v. Rocha

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 24, 20212:19-cv-00726California954 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL AJURIA RAMOS, No. 2:19-cv-0726 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER I. ROCHA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. On June 11, 2021, plaintiff wrote a letter stating he has no access to the prison law library unless he has a deadline or order on an active case. Plaintiff claims he needs to stay the subpoena the defendant filed on letters plaintiff wrote to his mother because they contain sensitive and private conversations, and needs to learn more about subpoenas. Plaintiff asks the court to send him an order or, if possible, someone to help plaintiff do research or file a motion, or contact the Honduras Consulate to assist him. Standards Governing Subpoenas Rule 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure governs subpoenas. A subpoena served upon a third party may seek (1) testimony, (2) the production of documents, electronically stored information or tangible things within the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.