(PC) Jolivette v. Superior Court of California, County of Solano

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 25, 20212:21-cv-00332California1,306 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL PATRICK JOLIVETTE No. 2:21-cv-0332-KJM-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SOLANO, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He has paid the filing fee.1 Screening Standards Notwithstanding payment of the filing fee, the court must screen plaintiff’s complaint in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must identify cognizable claims or dismiss the complaint, or any portion of the complaint, if the complaint “is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted,” or “seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.” Id. § 1915A(b).

1 Plaintiff paid the filing fee on May 25, 2021. Accordingly, the March 19, 2021 findings and recommendations recommending plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.