Pfeiffer

(PC) Smith v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 3, 20211:19-cv-00437California1,424 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JARMAAL SMITH, No. 1:19-cv-00437-NONE-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE1

v.

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS

CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, et al.,

Defendants.

16 This matter comes before the court upon initial review of the file, which was reassigned to the undersigned on November 17, 2020. (Doc. No. 17). As more fully set forth below, the undersigned recommends the court dismiss this case without prejudice due to plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this action and his refusal to accept the court’s order to show cause or update his address of record. I. FACTS AND BACKGROUND Plaintiff Jarmaal Smith is state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis on his civil rights complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. Nos. 1, 7). On December 10, 2019, the court granted plaintiff’s motion to amend his complaint and ordered the amended complaint to be file within thirty (30) days. (Doc.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.