Waddle

(PC) Castro v. Waddle

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 28, 20211:20-cv-01454California1,976 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL Z. CASTRO, No. 1:20-cv-01454-NONE-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY

INJUNCTION AND/OR TEMPORARY

C. WADDLE, RESTRAINING ORDER BE DENIED Defendant. (ECF No. 22) TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE 17 Plaintiff Daniel Z. Castro (“Plaintiff”), a state inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a motion for a preliminary injunction and/or temporary restraining order on April 9, 2021. (ECF No. 22.) Plaintiff requests an order granting him single cell status and prohibiting him from being placed in any other facility or housing unit unless for medical reasons. (Id.) For the foregoing reasons, the Court recommends denying Plaintiff’s motion. I. LEGAL STANDARDS FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF “A federal court may issue an injunction if it has personal jurisdiction over the parties…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.