(PC) Talamantes v. Merced County Jail

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 28, 20211:20-cv-01643California292 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEFFREY TALAMANTES, 1:20-cv-01643-DAD-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

REQUEST FOR COURT TO PROVIDE

vs. INFORMATION (ECF No. 8.) MERCED COUNTY JAIL, et al.,

Defendants.

18 19 Jeffrey Talamantes (“Plaintiff”) is a jail inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 26, 2021, Plaintiff filed a request for the court to inform him about his rights to protect himself, how to obtain copies from the Merced County Jail, and how to obtain witness statements. Plaintiff is advised that it is not the court’s duty to act as Plaintiff’s counsel or paralegal in these matters. Martinez v. Court of Appeal of Cal., Fourth Appellate Dist., 528 U.S. 152, 162, 120 S.Ct. 684, 145 L.Ed.2d 597 (2000) (“[T]he trial judge is under no duty to provide personal instruction on courtroom procedure or to perform any legal ‘chores’ for the defendant 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.