(HC)Bouras

(HC)Bouras v. Martel

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 4, 20212:17-cv-00649California584 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GEORGE JOHN BOURAS, No. 2:17-cv-00649-TLN-CKD Petitioner, v. ORDER MICHAEL MARTEL, Respondent. 16 Petitioner George John Bouras (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 17, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Petitioner and which contained that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 11.) Petitioner has not filed any objections to the findings and recommendations. Although it appears from the file that Petitioner’s copy of the Findings and Recommendations was returned, Petitioner was properly served. It is the Petitioner’s responsibility to keep the Court apprised of his current…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.