(PS) Ferrantino v. World Private Security, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY FERRANTINO, No. 2:18-cv-2338 KJM DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER WORLD PRIVATE SECURITY, INC;
WALMART STORES, INC.,
15 Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Anthony Ferrantino is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On November 2, 2020, defendant Walmart, Inc., was dismissed from this action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). (ECF No. 32.) Defendant World Private Security, Inc., has not appeared in this action. On March 12, 2021, and April 5, 2021, plaintiff filed motions for default judgment against defendant World Private Security, Inc. (ECF Nos. 38 & 40.) However, on April 22, 2021, plaintiff filed a request to “proceed no further in this complaint,” because plaintiff “has entered hospice care[.]” (ECF No. 42 at 1.) Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil…