Velasco

(PC) Gradford v. Velasco

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 7, 20211:20-cv-00543California823 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM J. GRADFORD, No. 1:20-cv-00543-NONE-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

v. “MOTION TO COMPELL WHEN SAFE AND

SECURE,” AND “PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

F. VELASCO and T. WEBSTER, FOR ORDER RE ORDER CONCERNING

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL” BE

Defendants. DENIED (ECF Nos. 54, 57) FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE 18 Plaintiff William J. Gradford (“Plaintiff”), a former pretrial detainee proceeding pro se 19 and in forma pauperis in this civil-rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, commenced this 20 action by filing a complaint on April 16, 2020. (ECF No. 1). On May 6, 2021, Plaintiff filed two 21 documents labeled motions: “Plaintiff’s motion to compell when safe and secure,” (ECF No. 54) 22 (as in original), and “Plaintiff’s request order concerning notice for voluntary [42] dismissal,” 23 (ECF No. 57) (brackets in original). Because…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.