Doe

(PC) Heim v. Doe

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 11, 20211:20-cv-00391California628 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRISTOPHER HEIM, 1:20-cv-00391-AWI-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE

TO AMEND AS MOOT

vs. (ECF No. 25.)

DOE, et al.,

Defendants.

23 I. BACKGROUND Christopher Heim (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 11, 2020, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) On May 14, 2020, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint as a matter of course. (ECF No. 13.) On January 4, 2021, Plaintiff filed the Second Amended Complaint with leave of court. (ECF No. 20.) On March 30, 2021, the court dismissed the Second Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim, with leave to amend. (ECF No. 21.) On May 3, 2021, Plaintiff filed the Third Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 22.) On May 6, 2021, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to amend the complaint. (ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.