Stahl

Stahl v. Klotz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20212:19-cv-00496California3,186 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Dusty Stahl, No. 2:19-cv-00496-KJM-CKD Plaintiff, ORDER Vv. Robert C. Klotz, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Dusty Stahl is a former clerk at the Amador County Superior Court. She brings 18 this whistleblower retaliation action against defendants, who all are Amador County Superior Court employees, in their individual capacities. Stahl has now filed her second amended 20 complaint. Defendants move to dismiss Stahl’s third claim under California Government Code section 8547.13. The court submitted the matter without oral argument. As explained below, the 22 court grants the motion to dismiss Stahl’s section 8547.13 claim without leave to amend. Stahl may proceed with her two remaining claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which the court has 24 addressed in its previous orders. 25 I. BACKGROUND When she worked as a clerk with Amador County Superior Court, Stahl alleges…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.