Mey

(PC) Lamon v. Mey

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 30, 20212:20-cv-01474California2,138 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BARRY LOUIS LAMON, No. 2: 20-cv-1474 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

S. MEY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is defendants’ motion to revoke plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (ECF No. 38.) For the reasons stated herein, the undersigned recommend that defendants’ motion be denied. On April 7, 2021, defendants filed a motion for an extension of time to file a reply to plaintiff’s opposition. (ECF No. 40.) Good cause appearing, defendants’ motion for an extension of time is granted. Defendants’ reply is deemed timely filed. The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PLRA”) permits a federal court to authorize the commencement and prosecution of any suit without prepayment of fees by a person who submits an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.