Doe

Doe v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 12, 20211:21-cv-00576California2,857 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN DOE, Case No. 1:21-cv-00576-NONE-SAB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED APPLICATION TO FILE v. PSEUDONYMOUSLY AND FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND

IMMIGRATION SERVICES, et al., (ECF Nos. 3, 11)

Defendants.

16 I. INTRODUCTION On April 6, 2021, John Doe (“Plaintiff”), a native and citizen of Yemen who filed for asylum in the United States in 2015, filed this action seeking a writ of mandamus and declaratory relief. (ECF No. 1.) Along with his complaint, Plaintiff filed an ex parte application, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) and Local Rule 141, requesting: (1) to use the pseudonym of “John Doe” in this proceeding; (2) to file a declaration of counsel Stacy Tolchin in support of Plaintiff’s petition for writ of mandamus, and the supporting documentation documents attached 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.