(PS) Allen v. City of Citrus Heights Police Dept.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CRAIG DOUGLAS ALLEN, No. 2:20–cv–1853–JAM–KJN PS Plaintiff, ORDER v. (ECF No. 9) CITRUS HEIGHTS POLICE DEPT., et al.,

15 Defendants. 16 Previously, the undersigned recommended plaintiff’s IFP application be denied, but that plaintiff be allowed to pay the filing fee in installments. (ECF No. 3.) The district court adopted these recommendations, and ordered that once the filing fee was satisfied, service on defendants could proceed. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff has satisfied the $400 filing fee, and so the case may proceed to the service-of-process phase. Further, the court is in receipt of plaintiff’s motion to seal. (ECF No. 9.) Requests to seal documents in this district are governed by Local Rule 141. In brief, the rule provides that documents may only be sealed by a written order of the court after a specific request to seal has been made. Local Rule 141(a). However, a mere request to seal is not enough. Local Rule 26 …