Bolt

(PC) Hernandez v. Bolt

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 12, 20211:21-cv-00385California438 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GILBERT FERNANDO HERNANDEZ, Case No. 1:21-cv-00385-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO SUBMIT APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

BOLT, et al., 21-DAY DEADLINE Defendants.

16 On Marcy 16, 2021, the Court ordered Plaintiff, within 45 days, to submit a court- provided application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) or to pay the filing fee for this action in full. (Doc. 4.) Although more than the allowed time has passed, Plaintiff has not filed an IFP application, paid the filing fee, or otherwise responded to the Court’s order. The Local Rules, corresponding with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, provide, “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with … any order of the Court may be grounds for the imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions … within the inherent power of the Court.” Local Rule 110. “District courts have inherent power to control their…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.