Kernan

(PC) Rodriguez v. Kernan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 12, 20211:19-cv-00060California1,101 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PEDRO RODRIGUEZ, 1:19-cv-00060-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION

v. (ECF No. 31.)

SCOTT KERNAN, et al., ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF THIRTY

DAYS TO EITHER:

Defendants. (1) FILE NEW MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME,

OR

(2) FILE SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

21 I. BACKGROUND Pedro Rodriguez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 14, 2019, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) On April 8, 2020, the court issued the first screening order, dismissing the Complaint for failure to state a claim, with leave to amend. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff was advised that he was not permitted to add unrelated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.