Toor

(PC) Madsen v. Toor

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 7, 20211:19-cv-00022California3,644 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL MADSEN, 1:19-cv-0022-AWI-JLT (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION

v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DR. KIRAN TOOR, (Docs. 17, 35)

Defendant. 14-DAY DEADLINE

16 Plaintiff Michael Madsen, a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action against a governmental employee under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for alleged constitutional violations. In his First Amended Complaint, Plaintiff asserts Eighth Amendment medical indifference claims against Defendant Dr. Kiran Toor for his failure to examine Plaintiff, provide adequate medical treatment his severe back impairments, and prescribe effective pain medication. (Doc. 12.) For the following reasons, the Court RECOMMENDS that Defendant’s motions for summary judgment be GRANTED. (Docs. 17, 35.) I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND A. Plaintiff’s Allegations Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.