Cryer

(PC) Raja v. Cryer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 17, 20211:19-cv-00817California723 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KHURAM RAJA, Case No. 1:19-cv-00817-DAD-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO THE EXTENT CERTAIN

v. DEADLINES ARE STAYED RYAN KIM, Medical Doctor, (Doc. No. 38) Defendant. 16 This matter comes before the court upon initial review of this case that was reassigned to the undersigned on November 17, 2020. (Doc. No. 35). Pending review is defendant’s motion seeking a 60-day extension of time to file a merits-based dispositive motion as previously set in the court’s Discovery and Scheduling Order. (Doc. No. 38). No opposition to the motion was filed. (See docket). For the reasons stated below, the court grants defendant’s motion to the extent the court stays the remaining deadlines in the Discovery and Scheduling Order (Doc. 24) pending resolution of defendant’s exhaustion-based summary judgment motion (Doc. No. 26). Plaintiff Khuram Raja, a former state prisoner, initiated this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.