(SS) Lora v. Commissioner of Social Security

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 11, 20211:21-cv-00640California817 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

C.C.R, Case No. 1:21-cv-0640-SAB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DENYING LUZ

v. LORA’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS AND DIRECTING

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, CLERK OF THE COURT TO RANDOMLY

ASSIGN MATTER TO DISTRICT JUDGE

Defendant. (ECF Nos. 5, 7)

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

18 C.C.R. (“Plaintiff”), by his guardian ad litem, Luz Lora, filed a complaint in this action seeking review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying disability benefits. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee in this action and instead Ms. Lora filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF No. 2.) However, the Court found that Plaintiff’s application did not provide sufficient information for the Court to determine if she is entitled to proceed in this action without prepayment of fees. In order to proceed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.