Vaden Anderson v. Amazon.Com, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 18, 20211:21-cv-00127California2,242 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VADEN ANDERSON, Case No. 1:21-cv-00127-NONE-BAM Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE AN

v. AMENDED COMPLAINT AMAZON.COM, INC, et al., (Doc. 1) Defendants. THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 Plaintiff Vaden Anderson (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated this employment discrimination action on January 29, 2021. Plaintiff’s complaint is currently before the Court for screening. (Doc. 1.) I. Screening Requirement and Standard The Court screens complaints brought by persons proceeding in pro se and in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to dismissal if it is frivolous or malicious, if it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or if it seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). /// 28 A complaint must…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.