Santoro

(PC) Hardy v. Santoro

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 7, 20211:21-cv-00327California4,169 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 KRISTIN HARDY, Case No. 1:21-cv-00327-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION

v. BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO KELLY SANTORO, et al., STATE A CLAIM 14 Defendants. (ECF No. 16)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

TWENTY-ONE DAYS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN

DISTRICT JUDGE Kristin Hardy (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on March 1, 2021. (ECF No. 1). On March 24, 2021, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that it failed to state any cognizable claims. (ECF No. 11). The Court gave Plaintiff thirty days to either: “a. File a First Amended Complaint; or b. Notify the Court in writing that he wants to stand on his complaint.” (Id. at 10-11). On April 21, 2021, Plaintiff filed his First Amended Complaint. (ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.