Brown

(PC) Peets v. Brown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 14, 20212:18-cv-02469California347 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LOUIS PEETS, No. 2:18-CV-2469-KJM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SCOTT KERNAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by the Eastern District of California local rules. Plaintiff filed a motion seeking a court order for access to a prison law library. ECF No. 36. On February 16, 2021, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within the time specified therein. ECF No. 39. The Magistrate Judge construed the motion as a motion for injunctive relief and recommended denying it. Id. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.