Kay

(HC) Afzal v. Kay

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 14, 20212:20-cv-01614California381 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MUHAMMAD TAHSEEN AFZAL, No. 2:20-cv-1614 AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

WENDY KAY, Respondent. 16 By order filed February 19, 2021, the undersigned screened the petition and found that it did not state any cognizable claims. ECF No. 10. Petitioner was given thirty days to file an amended petition and cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. at 2-3. After petitioner failed to file an amended petition, he was given an additional twenty-one days to amend the petition and warned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. ECF No. 12. Twenty-one days have now passed, and petitioner has not filed an amended petition or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to randomly assign a United States District Judge to this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.