Duran

(PC) Duran v. Duran

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 30, 20211:21-cv-00263California463 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAUL EDWARD DURAN, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-00263-AWI-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND v. ) RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DISMISSING ) ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A DURAN, et al., ) COGNZIABLE CLAIM FOR RELIEF

Defendants. ) ) (ECF No. 7) )

Plaintiff Paul Edward Duran is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 6, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations that the instant action be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief because the alleged due process violation in relation to the deprivation of his property must be addressed by way of California law. (ECF No. 7.) Those findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.