Ciolli

(PC) Barrett v. Ciolli

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 4, 20211:20-cv-01802California7,118 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY CURTIS BARRETT, Case No. 1:20-cv-01802-NONE-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION

v. PROCEED ON PLAINTIFF’S FIFTH

AMENDMENT AND EIGHTH

A.CIOLLI, et al., AMENDMENT CLAIMS AGAINST DOES

THROUGH 10 AND THAT ALL OTHER

Defendants. CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS BE

DISMISSED

16 (ECF No. 9)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

TWENTY-ONE DAYS 19 Plaintiff Anthony Curtis Barrett (“Plaintiff”) is a federal inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on December 22, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) On April 5, 2021, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that it failed to state any cognizable claims. (ECF No. 8.) The Court gave Plaintiff thirty days to either “a. File a First…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.