(SS) Cervantes v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 21, 20211:20-cv-00402California3,266 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 PEDRO NAVA CERVANTES, Case No. 1:20-cv-00402-EPG Plaintiff, FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER

REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S SOCIAL

v. SECURITY COMPLAINT COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL (ECF Nos. 16, 17.)

SECURITY,

Defendant. 17 18 19 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Pedro Nava Cervantes’ (“Plaintiff”) complaint for judicial review of an unfavorable decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (the “Commissioner”) regarding his application for Child’s Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income. The matter was taken under submission on the parties’ briefs without a hearing. The parties have consented to entry of final judgment by the United States Magistrate Judge under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) with any appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. (ECF Nos. 6, 10, 11.) Having reviewed the record, the administrative transcript, the parties’ briefs, and the applicable law, the Court finds as follows: A. The ALJ’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.