Dikran

(PC) McRae v. Dikran

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 28, 20211:16-cv-01066California7,016 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL SCOTT McRAE, 1:16-01066-NONE-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANT

v. BAIRAMIAN’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT BE GRANTED AS TO

BAIRAMIAN DIKRAN, et al., BIVENS CLAIMS, AND THAT THE

COURT DECLINE TO EXERCISE

Defendants. SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER

STATE LAW CLAIMS

(ECF No. 80.)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS

18 I. BACKGROUND Michael Scott McRae (“Plaintiff”) is a former federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint filed on March 9, 2018, against defendants Dr. Dikran Bairamian,1 Dr. Kevin Cuong Nguyen, and Dr. David Betz, alleging a Bivens claim for inadequate medical care under the Eighth Amendment and state law…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.