Dikran
(PC) McRae v. Dikran
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 28, 20211:16-cv-01066California7,016 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL SCOTT McRAE, 1:16-01066-NONE-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANT
v. BAIRAMIAN’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT BE GRANTED AS TO
BAIRAMIAN DIKRAN, et al., BIVENS CLAIMS, AND THAT THE
COURT DECLINE TO EXERCISE
Defendants. SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER
STATE LAW CLAIMS
(ECF No. 80.)
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
FOURTEEN DAYS
18 I. BACKGROUND Michael Scott McRae (“Plaintiff”) is a former federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint filed on March 9, 2018, against defendants Dr. Dikran Bairamian,1 Dr. Kevin Cuong Nguyen, and Dr. David Betz, alleging a Bivens claim for inadequate medical care under the Eighth Amendment and state law…