(PC) Ruiz v. Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 29, 20211:20-cv-00179California457 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE ALFONSO RUIZ, Case No. 1:20-cv-00179-DAD-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE

COURT’S ORDER

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 21-DAY DEADLINE 15 Defendants. 16 On February 3, 2021, this Court adopted the magistrate judge’s Findings and Recommendations to dismiss this action with leave to amend, due to Plaintiff’s failure to state a cognizable claim. (Doc. 13.) On March 18, 2021, the Court granted Plaintiff a thirty-day extension of time to comply with its order. (Doc. 16.) Although more than the allowed time has passed, Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint. The Local Rules, corresponding with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, provide that the “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with . . . any order of the Court may be grounds for the imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions . . . within the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.