Velasco

(PC) Gradford v. Velasco

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 30, 20211:20-cv-00543California2,064 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM J. GRADFORD, No. 1:20-cv-00543-NONE-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION DISMISS F. VELASCO and T. WEBSTER, (ECF No. 42) Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING GRANTING

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW

MOTION TO DISMISS

17 (ECF Nos. 49)

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR AN ORDER

20 (ECF No. 45)

TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE

WARNING CONCERNING FRIVOLOUS

FILINGS 24 Plaintiff William J. Gradford (“Plaintiff”), a former pretrial detainee, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Three of Plaintiff’s motions are pending before the Court: a motion to dismiss, (ECF No. 42), a motion to withdraw his motion to dismiss, (ECF No. 49), and a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.