Martinez
(PS) Grant v. Martinez
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK A. GRANT, Case No. 2:20-cv-01963-JDP Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS
CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE LUIS MARTINEZ, et al., RESPONSE DUE WITHIN 30 DAYS Defendants. ORDER VACATING THE MARCH 13, 2021
MOTION HEARING
16 On April 8, 2021, defendants filed a motion to dismiss and noticed the motion for hearing. ECF No. 26. Plaintiff has not responded and the deadline to do so has now passed. Accordingly, the court will order plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The court will also grant plaintiff another opportunity to respond to the pending motion and vacate the hearing. To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may dismiss a case for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute or failure to comply with a court order. See Fed.…