Ferrucci

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PERRY J. FERRUCCI, et al., No. 2:20–cv–1043–JAM–KJN Plaintiffs, SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER v. (ECF Nos. 27, 30.) BANK OF AMERICA, NA, et al., Defendants. 16 On April 22, 2021, the court held a hearing on a motion to compel brought by defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (ECF No. 27.) Thereafter, the court found that attorney’s fees were warranted under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(5)(A), and noted Experian’s rate and hours for the fee request in a declaration. (ECF No. 29, citing ECF No. 27-2 at ¶¶ 11-13.) Because plaintiffs indicated they might challenge the amount of the fee request, the court allowed additional time for briefing. On April 29, plaintiffs submitted a notice indicating they would submit to the court’s discretion on the fee amount. In defense counsel’s declaration, she indicated she spent 13 hours preparing and drafting the motion and joint statement. Counsel indicated these hours did not…