Bodukam

(PC) Ruiz v. Bodukam

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 28, 20212:19-cv-00146California701 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, No. 2:19-cv-00146-TLN-DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER VIJAY BODUKMAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s motions for reconsideration of the Court’s September 15, 2020, final judgment and for appointment of counsel. (ECF Nos. 29, 30.) The Court may grant reconsideration under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 59(e) and 60. Generally, a motion for reconsideration of a final judgment is appropriately brought under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). See Backlund v. Barnhart, 778 F.2d 1386, 1388 (9th Cir. 1985) (discussing reconsideration of summary judgment); see also Schroeder v. McDonald, 55 F.3d 454, 458-59 (9th Cir. 1995). The motion must be filed no later than twenty-eight (28) days after entry of the judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). Under Rule

…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.